zoe™ fluorescent cell imaging system Search Results


zoe fluorescent cell imager  (Bio-Rad)
96
Bio-Rad zoe fluorescent cell imager
Validation of codon‐optimised microdystrophin transgene in vitro. Transduction of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys vectors in C2C12 cells (A), at an MOI: 1 × 10 5 and its quantification (B) are shown. Representative images were obtained in confocal microscope (AXR Nikon) with a 40X objective (Scale bar: 50 μm). Semi‐quantification was performed from images ( n ≥ 8 per group) obtained <t>in</t> <t>ZOE‐Fluorescent</t> cell imager. The data is represented as mean ± SD. Asterisk (*) represents statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys treated conditions with respect to the cell control and Hash (#) refers to statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys with respect to AAV9K51Q‐μDys. # p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. For statistical comparison, a one‐way ANOVA was performed (GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software).
Zoe Fluorescent Cell Imager, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/zoe fluorescent cell imager/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
zoe fluorescent cell imager - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
firmware  (Bio-Rad)
99
Bio-Rad firmware
Validation of codon‐optimised microdystrophin transgene in vitro. Transduction of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys vectors in C2C12 cells (A), at an MOI: 1 × 10 5 and its quantification (B) are shown. Representative images were obtained in confocal microscope (AXR Nikon) with a 40X objective (Scale bar: 50 μm). Semi‐quantification was performed from images ( n ≥ 8 per group) obtained <t>in</t> <t>ZOE‐Fluorescent</t> cell imager. The data is represented as mean ± SD. Asterisk (*) represents statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys treated conditions with respect to the cell control and Hash (#) refers to statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys with respect to AAV9K51Q‐μDys. # p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. For statistical comparison, a one‐way ANOVA was performed (GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software).
Firmware, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/firmware/product/Bio-Rad
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
firmware - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Validation of codon‐optimised microdystrophin transgene in vitro. Transduction of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys vectors in C2C12 cells (A), at an MOI: 1 × 10 5 and its quantification (B) are shown. Representative images were obtained in confocal microscope (AXR Nikon) with a 40X objective (Scale bar: 50 μm). Semi‐quantification was performed from images ( n ≥ 8 per group) obtained in ZOE‐Fluorescent cell imager. The data is represented as mean ± SD. Asterisk (*) represents statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys treated conditions with respect to the cell control and Hash (#) refers to statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys with respect to AAV9K51Q‐μDys. # p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. For statistical comparison, a one‐way ANOVA was performed (GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software).

Journal: Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

Article Title: Bioengineered AAV9 and Optimised Microdystrophin Vectors Augment Phenotypic Rescue in a Murine Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

doi: 10.1111/jcmm.71078

Figure Lengend Snippet: Validation of codon‐optimised microdystrophin transgene in vitro. Transduction of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys vectors in C2C12 cells (A), at an MOI: 1 × 10 5 and its quantification (B) are shown. Representative images were obtained in confocal microscope (AXR Nikon) with a 40X objective (Scale bar: 50 μm). Semi‐quantification was performed from images ( n ≥ 8 per group) obtained in ZOE‐Fluorescent cell imager. The data is represented as mean ± SD. Asterisk (*) represents statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys treated conditions with respect to the cell control and Hash (#) refers to statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys with respect to AAV9K51Q‐μDys. # p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. For statistical comparison, a one‐way ANOVA was performed (GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software).

Article Snippet: The images were obtained in the ZOE‐Fluorescent cell imager (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and these images ( n ≥ 8/group) were further used for semi‐quantification analysis (ImageJ software).

Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, In Vitro, Transduction, Microscopy, Comparison, Control, Software